The stereotaxic navigation system identifies and registers certain anatomical landmarks between the tracked patient’s rigid anatomy and the patient’s radiographic images. During surgery, the surgeon uses specialized instruments (e.g., drivers, cut guides, needles) navigated by optical, electromagnetic, or other tracking methods to provide continuous, real-time visualization of the instruments’ position overlaid on the patient’s images(e.g., CT, MRI). The system creates 2-D and 3-D images, which guide and assist the surgeon before and during the procedure. Depending on the system and the accessories, a stereotaxic navigation system may be used during surgical procedures such as diagnostic biopsies, tumor resections, bone preparation and implant placement, placement of electrodes, otolaryngologic, or neurosurgical procedures.

Stereotaxic systems are generally considered framed or frameless.

  • Frame-based stereotaxic navigation systems require the attachment of a frame to the patient’s head using screws or pins. These systems rely upon the fixed location of the frame to calculate a trajectory and distance to a point of interest identified on the patient’s image.

Leksell Stereotactic System® Center of Arc Principle

  • Frameless stereotaxic navigation systems generally do not require the placement of a frame on the patient’s anatomy and tend to be more commonly used. These systems rely upon various technologies to track the location of the patient and navigated instruments in 3D space relative to registered patient imagery.

Image Guided Surgery for Brain Tumors


In the last  years frameless image-guided surgery, also popularized as neuronavigation, is considered standard of practice by most neurosurgical centers around the world. Its allows planning a deep brain tumor resection respecting tract fibers, eloquent areas and neurovascular structures (Fig.1.1 and Fig.1.2).The intraprocedural tracking avoids accidental complications and offers less invasive craniotomies. 

Neuronavigation is particularly useful in:

  • identification of neurovascular structures near the area of interest.
  • avoiding critical damage to close structures the neurosurgeon can´t directly see 
  • in large lesions, maximizes the extent of surgical removal staying within the limits of safe operability.[2]


Fig.1.1 StealthStation Cranial Visualization .Quickly visualize anatomy and structures, with automatic blending of key information in 3-D models.[1]

Fig.1.2 [6]


Registration approaches comparison

The precision of a neuronavigation system varies depending on utilized registration approach. The following commonly used approaches were compared: bone fiducials, scalp fiducials, and an auto-registration mask (Fig.1).

Fig. 1. The three different registration modes used in the study: (a) the auto-registration mask; (b) scalp fiducials; and (c) bone fiducials. In (d) the pointer is seen touching one of the external targets.[5]

Mask registration device

The Patient Registration Mask offers a fully automated and simplified registration process. The software automatically detects the mask’s LED positions as high density points on the intra-op scan and then during registration, software matches LEDs affixed to the patient. [4]

The auto-registration mask (Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG, Freiburg, Germany) is an adhesive, marker-free mask fitted with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) which is applied to the patient's face at the time of the surgical procedure.[5]

The mask can be used as a point-based registration system if the subject is scanned with the mask in place, or as a surface-based registration system if the mask is applied after scanning. In this study the mask was applied after the scanning process and immediately prior to the procedure, so it was used as a surface-based registration system.[5]

Precision

[5]

Navigational Accuracy Errors Associated with Frameless Stereotaxic Navigation Systems: FDA Safety Communication. 

Summary of Problem and Scope:
The FDA is aware that some health care providers have experienced navigational accuracy errors during surgical procedures when using frameless stereotaxic navigation systems. Some of these errors have led to patient deaths, serious or life-threatening injuries, and inaccurate, aborted, or prolonged medical procedures.

Based on our analysis, the FDA believes that there are many factors that contribute to these errors, and no particular system carries greater risk than others.

FDA analyzed data from multiple sources and determined that navigational accuracy errors may occur due to problems associated with one or more of the following:

  • Navigation Software and Hardware, including software anomalies and hardware damage or defects;
  • System Complexity (Human Factors), including use errors in inputs, system setup and execution of system and surgical techniques;
  • Compatibility, including the use of incompatible accessory instruments with the stereotaxic navigation system;
  • Anatomical Complexity, including surgical requirements and intraoperative shift (e.g., brain shift, local tissue deformation from tissue resection, spinal movement);
  • Registration & Tracking, including poor registration and movement of the registration fiducials or reference array; and
  • Medical Image Quality, including insufficient image resolution and incomplete images.[3]

    Recommendations for Health Care Providers:
    The FDA recommends that health care providers consider the following information and actions to reduce the potential of serious adverse events:

    • Be aware that based on current information, the FDA believes the overall benefits of these devices continue to outweigh the risks in appropriately selected patients when used by properly trained surgeons, and we have not determined that any particular system carries greater risk than others.
    • Assess navigational accuracy repeatedly throughout a procedure when using a surgical navigation system.
      • Reconfirm accuracy by positioning the navigated instrument tip on an identifiable anatomical landmark and comparing the actual tip location to that displayed by the system.
      • If the stereotaxic navigation system does not appear to be accurate despite troubleshooting (e.g., resetting the system), do not rely on the navigation system.[3]

    Navigation Software and Hardware

    • Be aware of any manufacturer’s recommended software updates related to the safe performance of the system, and update as needed.
    • Inspect the stereotaxic navigational system, including any components or accessory devices, prior to each use.
    • Do not use devices, components, or accessories if they are visibly damaged, have been dropped or are not performing as expected.
      • Remove any defective component or accessory from inventory and return it to the manufacturer for maintenance and inspection.
    • Be aware of the stereotaxic navigation system’s technological principles and limitations including:
      • Electromagnetic based navigation systems are subject to interference from metallic objects or other emitters that can impact navigational accuracy, or may interfere with other devices and/or implants. If you suspect interference, move equipment further apart, use a radio frequency barrier, or do not use the stereotaxic navigation system if it is not operating as intended.
      • Optical-based navigation systems may experience line-of-sight issues that may require hardware re-positioning or interference from infrared light sources. If you suspect interference, move equipment further apart, discontinue use of the infrared emitter, or do not use the stereotaxic navigation system if it is not operating as intended.[3]

    System Complexity 

    • Be aware of the operating principles and limitations.
      • Select the appropriate accessories for the surgical procedure. Be aware that not all accessories are appropriate for all applications (e.g. minimally invasive procedure accessories versus open procedure accessories).
      • Understand error modes and recovery methods.
      • Understand the stereotaxic navigation system’s accuracy limitations for the specific surgical procedure.
    • Review and follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use and recommended training, and contact the applicable manufacturer with any questions.[3]

    Compatibility

    • Be aware that not all surgical instruments are appropriate for stereotaxic navigation.
      • Review the manufacturer’s labeling to make sure the instruments are compatible with the stereotaxic navigation system.
    • Be aware that some stereotaxic navigation systems are designed to be used with specific instruments that have been modified to support navigation, while others may be compatible with unmodified instruments that are straight and rigid.
      • For example, asymmetrical or flexible instruments may not be appropriate for navigation as the system may not be able to predict the instrument’s location.
      • Refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for use, or contact the applicable device manufacturer for further information.[3]

    Anatomical Complexity

    • Be aware that certain stereotaxic navigation applications rely upon a rigid anatomical structure to track the target location.
      • Accuracy decreases when navigating to targets away from the tracked structure due to anatomic shifting experienced during the procedure (e.g., brain shift, local tissue deformation from tissue resection, spinal movement).
      • Position the patient tracker on a rigid anatomical structure as close as possible to the desired navigational target.
      • If navigational accuracy error is suspected, confirm the instrument’s position using intra-operative imaging or convert to a non-navigated surgical method.[3]

    Registration & Tracking

    • Be aware that the registration process establishes baseline navigational accuracy. If prompted by the system, only proceed if the registration error estimate matches your clinical requirements.
    • Be aware that several patient tracking methods may be available, but they may not provide the same benefits, risks, and fixation quality.
      • For example, a bone screw-based registration method and a strap-based registration method could be options.
      • Because the navigation system cannot immediately detect movement of the patient reference relative to the tracked anatomy, carefully select a patient tracking method based upon the clinical tolerance for navigational error.[3]

    Medical Image Quality

    • Select a pre-procedural imaging modality (e.g., CT, MRI, X-ray) that contains the information necessary to accurately complete the planned surgical intervention.
    • Ensure that individual patient images are of sufficient quality (e.g., slice thickness, field of view (FOV), spatial resolution, noise level, artifact) and real-time (e.g. represents the patient’s anatomical structures) to enable accurate stereotaxic navigation.
    • Follow any image acquisition and reconstruction protocols provided by the stereotaxic navigation system manufacturer.
    • Consult with a radiologist as needed.[3]

As an inference from the FDA article I would say that  the main problem is a great amount of nuances occurring while using frameless navigation and which should be taken into account.  The surgeon should be extremely well prepared and experienced. He should be aware of the principles of the stereotaxic navigation as well as of the system limitations and understand that the system will not do everything by itself; otherwise various undesirable issues are probable, f.e decrease of accuracy. That means that a training phase matters.

References

[1] http://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/neurological/surgical-navigation-systems/stealthstation/cranial-neurosurgery-navigation.html (19.06.2017)

[2] Erasmo Barros da Silva Jr., Jerônimo Buzetti Milano, Luis Fernando Moura da Silva Jr., Lucas Alves Aurich and Ricardo Ramina (2012). Neuronavigation for Intracranial Meningiomas, Meningiomas - Management and Surgery, Dr. Daniel Monleon (Ed.), InTech, DOI: 10.5772/29456. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/meningiomas-management-and-surgery/neuronavigation-for-intracranial-meningiomas

[3] https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm563249.htm ( June 15, 2017)

[4] https://nse.stryker.com/products/cranialmap-3/  ( June 19, 2017)

[5] . (2015) Precision of image-based registration for intraoperative navigation in the presence of metal artifacts: Application to corrective osteotomy surgery. Medical Engineering & Physics 37:6, pages 524-530. 

[6] http://www.worldneurosurgery.org


  • Keine Stichwörter